There are several reasons why a rear-end collision occurs. Some of them are based on driver error, while others may not be the driver’s fault in the back. Knowing this will allow you to decide on who is at fault if you ever find yourself in a position where you need to determine that answer for yourself or someone else.
By reading this article, you will learn how to determine whether or not you might be able to use these applicable laws to your advantage. However, seeking professional help from an Injury Lawyer in Calgary is always recommended to understand your case better.
Establishing Fault In Rear-End Car Accidents
In the majority of rear-end collisions, the driver of the car who rear-ends the other vehicle is held at least partially liable for the accident. But, of course, this does not absolve the person in the front car from any responsibility for what has happened. They may also be at fault for having stopped suddenly or for driving too slowly, but it helps to know that the driver behind them is usually found to be at least partially responsible.
A driver that bumps the vehicle in front is commonly considered at fault, not just because he did not provide himself with enough room, but because he didn’t pay attention to his driving. A driver who rear-ends another car and does not bring the accident to a halt will be considered even more at fault since stopping should be his priority after hitting the vehicle in front of him. You should always leave enough distance ahead when you’re driving your car to allow room for an evasive maneuver if the car ahead stops suddenly.
The court will look at how much of that collision was your fault. To pinpoint blame, it’s better if the accident report has a diagram and Injury Lawyer in Calgary is beside you.
Contributory Negligence vs. Comparative Negligence
Contributory Negligence
While most states no longer follow this system, a handful still do. In essence, the law of contributory negligence states that if a lawyer can show that your negligence contributed to the accident to any degree, then you are barred from recovering anything from the at-fault party.
Comparative Negligence
Comparative negligence is a form of tort law, which divides the liability drivers. If a driver is found to be even 1% at fault for the accident, they can be held liable for some costs.A rear-end collision may seem like a minor fender bender, but the impact can cause serious injury. If you’ve been injured in a rear-end collision, contact an experienced rear-end collision Injury Lawyer in Calgary immediately. For more information visit Our Website